eeeck/CANdigger
1
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 7 Pull Requests 1 Actions Projects 1 Releases 6 Wiki Activity

Improve queue sharing efficiency #28

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-06-20 16:25:27 +02:00 by eeeck · 0 comments
eeeck commented 2026-06-20 16:25:27 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Currently CAN queue are being copied to the UART queue and then will be copied on the SD queue.

Maybe this can be made more efficient by sharing these objects instead of copying them. Check out RTOS mutexes, if they can be of help

Currently CAN queue are being copied to the UART queue and then will be copied on the SD queue. Maybe this can be made more efficient by sharing these objects instead of copying them. Check out RTOS mutexes, if they can be of help
eeeck added the enhancement label 2026-06-20 16:25:27 +02:00
eeeck self-assigned this 2026-06-20 16:25:27 +02:00
eeeck added this to the Thesis SCRUM project 2026-06-20 16:25:27 +02:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working
 docs
Documentation related issue
 enhancement
Enchancement on an existing feature
 experimental
Experimental stuff
 feature
A new feature
 hardware
Hardware related issue
 invalid
Something is wrong
 minor
Small changes
 not planned
Feature not planned
 test
Testing/flashing related issues
No Label enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project Thesis SCRUM
Assignees
Clear assignees
eeeck (Erick)
No Assignees eeeck
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: eeeck/CANdigger#28
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?