not matching Darknet #292

New Issue

2022-06-21T20:57:23+02:00

harsco-jfernandez commented

2022-06-21 20:57:23 +02:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Hi,

Recently I updated all the libraries(Darknet and tkDNN) and noticed that there are incorrect object recognitions in tkDNN that were not there on prior tkDNN version, and also, Darknet doesn't detect them incorrectly. I expect precision differences because of FP16, but object detection should be identical?

I've no clue where to begin to look to learn more. Any advice?

Hi, Recently I updated all the libraries(Darknet and tkDNN) and noticed that there are incorrect object recognitions in tkDNN that were not there on prior tkDNN version, and also, Darknet doesn't detect them incorrectly. I expect precision differences because of FP16, but object detection should be identical? I've no clue where to begin to look to learn more. Any advice?

perseusdg commented

2022-06-23 17:38:33 +02:00

(Migrated from github.com)

can you share more details on your issue like a screenshot of the wrong predictions ,with what models are you experiencing this issue and your setup (windows or linux) ?

This repo is archived. You cannot comment on issues.

1 Participants

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: mmr/tkDNN#292